Cirrus SF50 Jet Pilot Does ‘Right Thing’ And Deploys Chute

Screenshot from FlightAware
Credit: Screenshot from FlightAware

The pilot of a Cirrus Vision Jet SF-50 Vision Jet became the first pilot in the aircraft’s history to deploy the jet’s parachute during an accident on Sept. 9 in Orlando. 

The personal jet, N77VJ, had departed from the Opa-Locka Executive Airport near Miami at 2:13 local time. Less than an hour later, after encountering severe turbulence, the pilot pulled the chute and landed in Lake Tohopekaliga, Orlando, according to the FAA. The pilot and two passengers received minor injuries. 

The jet, manufactured in 2018, is registered to TAC9, based in Plantation, Florida. It is co-owned by TAC9 and Vision Aviation, according to FAA records. An investigation by the National Transportation Safety Board is ongoing. 

“What we’re excited about is that the pilot did the right thing, meaning he pulled the chute when he wasn’t in control of the airplane,” Zean Nielsen, Cirrus CEO, told The Weekly of Business Aviation. “All the passengers lived and walked away relatively unscathed.” 

In training, Cirrus educates pilots on when to pull the Cirrus Airframe Parachute System—and when to not. 

“It worked,” Nielsen says. “The parachute did its job .... You could not have wished for a better outcome.”

The parachute system is standard equipment on the company’s lineup of products, including the SR20, SR22, SR22T single-engine piston aircraft and its SF50 Vision Jet. 

In all, Cirrus pilots have pulled chutes 117 times with 238 lives saved, Nielsen says. “Now, 238 people returned safely to their loved ones.” When a pilot pulls the parachute, essentially, he or she has lost control of the aircraft, and no runway close enough to use, he says. There are a variety of emergencies precluding that, including running out of fuel, bad weather conditions and other conditions. 

Over the years, a number of chute deployments have been caught on video and featured on YouTube. 

Molly McMillin

Molly McMillin, a 25-year aviation journalist, is managing editor of business aviation for the Aviation Week Network and editor-in-chief of The Weekly of Business Aviation, an Aviation Week market intelligence report.

Comments

4 Comments
I realize that Cirrus is going to look on the bright side, and credit their parachute. I’m going to wait on the NTSB to look into the Aeronautical Decision Making (ADM) related to flying towards a thunderstorm, and the mindset of the parachute as a last “line of defense”.
Then, perhaps Cirrus can take a hard look at their training program and help some pilots from getting into trouble in the first place.
This is an absurd “puff piece” for Cirrus…not a serious article describing the actual facts surrounding the event. How did the pilot blunder unknowingly into a severe thunderstorm? Why didn’t he disconnect the autopilot, slow the plane down, and simply hand-fly the plane through the storm or reverse course? Did the plane sustain any structural damage before the chute deployment? The ballistic parachute should not be a crutch for lack of basic flying ability and proper training.
Having experienced severe turbulence in a 4 seat Cessna I would not have lost hope just to rely on a parachute! Gently hand fly close to Va and let it climb and descend. If you try to maintain altitude and speed it will break! Our ELT was set off by the stomping we got; but nothing bent or broke! That ELT made radio communications with ARTCC impossible! Set the transponder to 7700 and land as soon as practicable.
I agree with the first three comments. It sounds like an inexperienced pilot got in over his head, with no idea how to get out. This is an argument for the FAA not to reduce required flight hours to qualify for various ratings/positions. Was this a part 91 or 135 operation? What were the pilot's qualifications and flight experience? Answers to these questions will help fill in the picture. It doesn't reflect well on the training Cirrus provided.