Test AW story

The amount surprised many industry veterans and independent observers, given that it is pricier than the Boeing 787 widebody, where the peak (deferred) cost of development was an estimated $32 billion. Calhoun’s assumption that Boeing’s next aircraft will be less successful in cost control and project management than its previous major program seems an unsettling way to advertise the prowess and products of any engineering company.

The amount surprised many industry veterans and independent observers, given that it is pricier than the Boeing 787 widebody, where the peak (deferred) cost of development was an estimated $32 billion. Calhoun’s assumption that Boeing’s next aircraft will be less successful in cost control and project management than its previous major program seems an unsettling way to advertise the prowess and products of any engineering company.

The amount surprised many industry veterans and independent observers, given that it is pricier than the Boeing 787 widebody, where the peak (deferred) cost of development was an estimated $32 billion. Calhoun’s assumption that Boeing’s next aircraft will be less successful in cost control and project management than its previous major program seems an unsettling way to advertise the prowess and products of any engineering company.

The amount surprised many industry veterans and independent observers, given that it is pricier than the Boeing 787 widebody, where the peak (deferred) cost of development was an estimated $32 billion. Calhoun’s assumption that Boeing’s next aircraft will be less successful in cost control and project management than its previous major program seems an unsettling way to advertise the prowess and products of any engineering company.